Purpose of this project
The purpose of this project is to catalog and estimate the prices of "Collectible Stocks and Bonds from North American Railroads."
In 2017, I expanded the project to include scripophily to North American Coal Companies.
To put a finer point on that, I want to catalog every collectible stock, bond, or closely-related document issued by a company that operated, or intended to operate a railroad or coal company anywhere in North America.
Unfortunately, that definition has proven insufficient for everyone. Collectors have always wanted me to expand my project in one direction or another "just a little bit."
I truly understand their intentions, and given enough time, I would comply. The problem is that "a little bit" has usually meant adding one more:
- type of collectible (e.g. passes, paper money, etc.)
- type of business (e.g., bridge company, utility, etc.)
Unfortunately, those "little" expansions create gigantic problems
Time is an irreplaceable commodity. If I were to enlarge my project to include only one more near-topic business type or collectible category, I would be committing to open-ended hours of additional work, now and forever in the future.
I could not start now and simply go forward. How could I possibly estimate prices or scarcity of new collectibles without a history? To acquire that history, I must go back through every auction catalog, every price list, and every reference in order to catalog every previous offering and sale that was related to the new business type or collectible. Indexes do not exist, so every trip through old catalogs and price lists takes 40 to 60 hours of page-by-page searching over the course of several weeks. And then, looking into the future, I must make special efforts to locate those same collectibles every time a new auction appears. Even tiny expansions create huge time commitments!
If I honored ONE expansion request, would that be the last request collectors would ever make?
It is true that I expanded the project to include Coal Companies several years ago. I did this because coal companies had always been an intererst. After all, my profession was evaluating coal deposits and coal mines, and coal companies constitute a tiny specialty with few surviving certificates.
To reiterate, my goal is to catalog
COLLECTIBLE STOCKS and BONDs from
COMPANIES that
OPERATED or planned to operate
RAILROADS or mine COAL in
NORTH AMERICA.
Let me explain my goal a bit more. (Click items in the blue menu below to see discussions about each part of my goal.)
- COLLECTIBLE
- STOCKS and BONDS from
- COMPANIES that planned to
- OPERATE
- RAILROADS or mine coal in
- NORTH AMERICA
COLLECTIBILITY
My stance is that at least one certificate must exist in order to be considered collectible.
At the end of 2024, I had cataloged slightly over 24,000 varieties and sub-varieties of railroad certificates plus I suspect encompasses over 98% percent of all railroad varieties that still exist.
I also cataloged more than 2,600 coal companies and companies that "sounded" like coal companies. I have no real good idea what percentage that might represent, but new finds have already slowed significantly. I'm we've identified 90% of available varieties.
A few correspondents have suggested I catalog ALL the different kinds of railroad certificates that ever existed, whether they are currently known or not. Other than the fact that the lack or unavailability of records makes that impossible, I wonder why 26,000 varieties of railroad certificates is insufficient.
On the left below is a highly-oxidized zinc plate that was used to print a a 100-share stock certificate of the Utica Chenango & Susquehanna Valley Railway Co. It is terribly difficult to read even in person. On the right is an odd-share certificate from the same series. I have never seen a listing for a collectible 100-share certificate, nor has anyone ever reported one to me. Even though the plate exists, I see no compelling reason to catalog the 100-sh certificate until one appears.
What about certificates locked away in museums and historical societies?
I catalog them when collectors report them to me because they DO EXIST, and hence, consider them "collectible."
Like it or not, accept it or not, a small number of certificates held in museums and societies WILL be stolen and they WILL end up in collections. Practically all repositories have sustained losses and losses not likely to stop. The Vatican Library has sustained numerous losses and if thefts can happen there, they can happen at historical societies with greatly inferior safeguards.
Even if losses stopped today, I suggest museums and societies will be sources of certificates as time goes on. Financial documents like stocks and bonds are rarely "centerpiece" holdings to those kinds of institutions. museums and societies receive new and more relevant contributions continually. Without infinite cash donations, every society and every museum will reach its limits. Many small societies already have huge problems with storage, display, and security. Many are hamstrung with well-intentioned policies created when such problems were unimaginable. Yes, it is true that organizations are not necessarily planning to de-accession tomorrow. Make no mistake, however, they WILL be forced to think about it sooner or later. It is my strong opinion that deaccessioning is inevitable and an unpredictable number of stocks and bonds will ultimately find their ways back to collectors.
STOCKS and BONDS
A stock certificate represents part ownership OF a company. A bond represents a loan made TO a company. I explain those differences more fully elsewhere in this website. Collectively, stocks and bonds are known as "securities" and that is specifically what the project catalogs.
Additionally, there are other kinds of documents that were designed to be stand-ins for securities. For instance, temporary stocks and temporary bonds served as securities prior to the printing and issuance of more formal certificates.
There were also subscription receipts which were given when investors advanced some amount of money against the purchase of stocks or bonds. They were de facto securities in that they could be sold to other investors willing to further fund purchases.
Certificates of deposit were receipts for stock or bonds deposited with some sort of financial institution or trust company, usually when railroad companies were going through reorganization or bankruptcy. They too served as de facto securities during periods when companies were trying to right themselves. If companies fell into bankruptcy, then they served exactly like stocks or bonds when assets were being divided among creditors and owners.
Several other less common documents played (or had the potential to play) similar roles and are therefore cataloged in this project. Conversely, there are numbers of documents commonly encountered by collectors that never had any security role whatsoever. Those documents are NOT cataloged. Non-cataloged documents commonly include bank notes, promissory notes, proxy forms, passes, tickets, checks, warrants and invoices. While coupons were attached to bonds, they had a single purpose: the demand for the collection of interest. Coupons were representations of debt. Like any other unpaid debt, coupons could be accumulated and used to foreclose on companies. However, they were NOT securities I do NOT catalog them.
There are also a few curious documents that look like obsolete bank notes and functioned that way in local commerce within railroad service areas. They played a role similar to coal company scrip. Some even carry text that promised to pay interest similar to short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, however, they lacked contractual guarantees for repayment. Therefore, they were simply promissory notes; they were not securities. They are NOT cataloged in this project.
COMPANIES
A forgiving definition of a company would be "an organization that makes money by selling goods or services." While that definition is true, this project defines a "company" more formally as "a legal entity officially authorized to conduct business."
The authority to officially operate as a company usually held by second-level governmental bodies such as states, territories, and provinces, In a few rare cases, corporate authorizations were granted by national governments. A few instances have been reported where third-level bodies such as counties authorized incorporation of railroads, but one needs to wonder how far such rights would have extended.
Over two-thirds of all officially authorized rail-related entities use the word "Company" in their names. About 1% use the word "Corporation" and slightly more use some form of "Inc.," "Incorporated" or "Incorporation." "Compañia" and "Limitada" appear sparingly on Mexican certificates.
The word "Limited," "Company Limited," or "Limited Company" is generally a British term and was used fewer than 150 times in Canada and the United States. "LLC" or "Limited Liability Company" is a relatively recent business form used in the United States. Fewer than forty rail-related companies have been discovered that have used that term.
The remaining 30% of companies are somewhat mysterious. Some use the word "Railroad" or "Railway" without implying any particular business form. That does not mean they did not use "Company" in their articles of incorporation; chances are, they decided to leave it off certificates for some reason.
A large percentage of early locomotive and rolling stock builders did NOT incorporate. One must assume they were unconcerned about liability protection. As rail traffic (and presumably lawsuits) increased, most merged and incorporated. Since they were so important to railroading, names of those unincorporated manufacturers are recorded in this database, even though they will never be represented by collectible securities.
Equipment trust certificates (ETCs) began appearing within a few years of 1900. These were certificates issued by investment banks, savings institutions, and trust companies in order to buy equipment. Purchased equipment was then leased and eventually sold to railroad companies, very much like automotive leasing companies do today. Trusts are not officially incorporated companies, but nonetheless operate under the same general legal framework, and ETC are officially classified as securities. While the names of railroad companies appear in the titles of all ETCs, collectors should note that very few attached the words "Company" or "Corporation" to their names. That is because ETCs were not issued BY railroad companies but FOR railroad companies. Therefore, they are all included in this project. Because they are collateralized by well-secured hard assets, ETCs remain popular investment vehicles today.
OPERATIONS
An "operational railroad" is one that carried passengers or freight over rails. Nothing in that definition speaks to profitability, length of operation, or anything other than movement. In that respect, a stickler could define "operation" as rolling a handcar over two pieces of rusty rail nailed to a couple crossties laying on raw dirt.
"Paper railroads" are those that officially incorporated but never operated. Some may have attempted to sell stock and failed. Some may have sold stock and failed to borrow sufficient money to lay track. Some may have incorporated at the wrong time and some may have formed simply to hold rights to a route. I really do not have a good feel for how many paper railroads printed certificates, but I suspect a majority.
Some collectors who refuse to buy certificates from any company that did not operate. Other collectors think the histories of paper roads are greatly more fascinating than those of operational lines. Even today, many entrepreneurs will argue there is often more to be learned from failures than from immediate successes.
The goal of this project is to list all certificates from North American railroads, not eliminate some because they did not nurse a third-hand locomotive over bumpy track for a couple thousand feet. Remember, the goal of any company is to make money. If more money could have been made by selling before firing up a locomotive or even laying rail, then some paper companies were more successful than companies that collapsed into bankruptcy after a few months. Consequently, this project makes no distinction between paper railroads that planned to operate in North America and those that actually did.
RAILROADS, RAILWAYS
The definition of "railroad" can be somewhat flexible. This project considers a railroad "company" to be an officially chartered or incorporated entity that was formed for the purpose of carrying unrelated passengers and/or freight from a point of origination to a different point of destination, usually crossing land that was not owned by the company. I am not concerned about where funding sources were located or where companies were incorporated. To be cataloged, such companies must have planned to operate in North America
Numerous industries used railroad equipment for their private purposes. If they incorporated their rail ventures separately, they are included. Otherwise, not.
To accommodate collectors, I include ancillary companies such as rolling stock builders, locomotive builders, parts manufacturers, and the like.
Records of corporate purposes and operations are usually nebulous and it would take hours to determine the extent of their involvement in railroading even if records were available. The largest groups of questionable companies include utilities, bridge companies, and tunnel companies. I include them in this project IF AND ONLY IF they clearly reference railroading in their corporate names.
I have an extensive explanation about the types of companies I include and exclude from this project. Please see Rules for listing.
NORTH AMERICA
My area of interest is North America which I define as any land mass north of the northern coast of South America and beyond the Colombian border with Panama. I include the Hawaiian islands, the Caribbean islands, and all parts of Canada.
I include all certificates printed in other countries that intended to benefit, fund, or operate railroads in North America. The greatest number originated in the Netherlands to represent Dutch traders who invested in numerous American railroads as well as a few in Mexico. Similar certificates were likely used in the United Kingdom, but only three varieties are currently known. A small number of certificates from Germany, France, and Belgium are also known, intended primarily for investing in Mexico, Central America, Panama, and the Caribbean.